Monday, November 14, 2011

Ever Been Told You're "Stupid" or "Don't Measure Up"?

I think that many of us end up marginalized and lost because we are told by some of our educators that we are "stupid" because we struggle with understanding the material they want us to learn (or perhaps we struggle with the methodology they use to teach us).

If this has ever been your experience, I hope this creative video of illustrations of a talk given by Sir Ken Robinson encourages you. I particularly like this line in the video: "Collaboration is the stuff of growth." We too often section ourselves off from each other and make ourselves the master of our own education, perhaps in part because the world keeps stressing our work as individuals against our work as groups.

Surely the individual is important, but we weren't created to be islands unto ourselves. Humans are social creatures, as God himself noted when he created us: "It is not good for the man to be alone" (Genesis 2:18). (Of course, women were not simply created just to keep men company. I fear that this verse is too often used to suggest this. God did not create women just to please men. I want to be emphatic about this. I think the larger point of this passage is that God recognized that humans are not mean to be alone, and Adam needed another person---someone different from/other than him---to be present as well. Feel free to disagree with me in the comments if you think I'm way off base here.)

I think this corresponds to biblical truth, actually. Part of loving our neighbors involves giving everyone a voice (by providing conditions in which they are encouraged to speak and by subsequently listening to them when they speak). Just because someone does not have what we would call "academic" abilities, for instance, does not mean that they do not have something constructive to say.

I think the root of the problem is human pride. We are often so arrogant in the way that we refuse to let our paradigms be challenged, whether they are educational, business-oriented, intellectual, or economic in nature. If we can show that a particular paradigm has "worked" in some sense ("hey, my business model is keeping in my company in business, after all"), we then cite that as evidence for avoiding any kind of change, and we therefore continue to slide past the people who don't measure up to the way we do things. (That is, so what if your "business model" keeps your company in business if it squashes the "least" of your employees in the process?)

Bottom line: No matter where you operate in life, never develop an attitude of "unteachability" or "personal inerrancy." Allow yourself to be challenged.

The truly stupid people are those who think they have nothing more to learn.

Saturday, November 12, 2011

The Conservative Christian / Pro-gay Conversation

Is the debate over the legitimacy of same-sex relationships the only thing traditional Christians and pro-gay activists have in common? (In fact, is it even somewhat problematic to limit the term "pro-gay activists" to "those who believe that homosexuality is okay or even to be celebrated"? Perhaps even the term "traditional Christian" is a bit tricky, as Fred Phelps would identify himself as a "traditional Christian," but I have several problems with what he believes.)

For a good conversation-starter, check out Rachel Held Evans's guest blogger Richard Beck's post "A Non-Zero-Sum Conversation Between the Traditional Church and the Gay Community." Definitely worth a read.

Should we talk about whether homosexuality is "biblical" (or moral)? Beck resolutely answers that question with a yes, but he does not want us to limit the conversation to JUST that question. And I agree. But what are your thoughts? (I should remind all readers that this guy's name is Richard Beck, not Glenn Beck. Very important distinction.)